Applying the UTAUT Model to Understand Factors Affecting the Use of Learning Management System for Learning Pedagogical Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.14.01.41Keywords:
UTAUT model, Learning Management Systems (LMS), PedagogyAbstract
This research will identify factors that can influence students when using the learning management system (LMS) in learning educational pedagogy. The LMS that we mean in this study is Pedagogi.id Platform. This study aims to discover the factors influencing students to improve their pedagogical abilities using the Pedagogi.id Platform. The design model in the study uses the UTAUT model. Questionnaires with five UTAUT variables, namely performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, facilitating condition, behavioral intention, and use behavior, were distributed to students at one of the universities in Bandung. Hypothesis testing or data analysis of this study using the Structural Equation Model (SEM) approach with the help of the SmartPLS application. The results showed that the entire hypothesis was accepted or had a significant influence between variables. The most potent factors shown based on the results of the magnitude of influence are the variables facilitating conditions on student usage behavior and performance expectancy on student behavior intention. Therefore, this study recommends learning by utilizing technology, especially in universities, to improve students' knowledge and skills, one of which is using the Pedagogi.id Platform
Downloads
References
Abbad, M. M. M. (2021). Using the UTAUT model to understand students’ usage of e-learning systems in developing countries. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 7205–7224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10573-5
Altalhi, M. (2021). Toward a model for acceptance of MOOCs in higher education: the modified UTAUT model for Saudi Arabia. Education and Information Technologies, 26(2), 1589–1605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10317-x
Attuquayefio, S. N., & Addo, H. (2014). Using the UTAUT model to analyze students ’ ICT adoption. International Journal of Education and Development Using Indormation and Communication Technology, 10(3), 75–86.
Awanto, A. N., Ardianto, Y. T., & Prasetya, A. (2020). UTAUT Model Implementation On User Behavior In Use Of Information Technology. Jurnal Teknologi Dan Manajemen Informatika, 6(1), 53–59. https://doi.org/10.26905/jtmi.v6i1.4156
Ayu, M. (2020). Online Learning: Leading e-Learning at Higher Education. The Journal of English Literacy Education: The Teaching and Learning of English as a Foreign Language, 7(1), 47–54. https://doi.org/10.36706/jele.v7i1.11515
Bashooir, K., & Supahar. (2018). Validitas dan Reliabilitas Instrumen Asesmen Kinerja Literasi Sains Pelajaran Fisika Berbasis STEM. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 22(2), 219–230. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v22i2.20270
Bervell, B., & Umar, I. N. (2017). Validation of the UTAUT model: Re-considering non-linear relationships of exogeneous variables in higher education technology acceptance research. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(10), 6471–6490. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/78076
Bradley, V. M. (2020). Learning Management System (LMS) Use with Online Instruction. International Journal of Technology in Education, 4(1), 68. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.36
Davidson-Shivers, G. V., Rasmussen, K. L., & Lowenthal, P. R. (2018). Overview of Online Instruction and Learning Environments and Communities. Web-Based Learning, 3–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67840-5_1
El-Masri, M., & Tarhini, A. (2017). Factors affecting the adoption of e-learning systems in Qatar and USA: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2 (UTAUT2). Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(3), 743–763. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9508-8
Gunasinghe, A., Hamid, J. A., Khatibi, A., & Azam, S. M. F. (2020). The adequacy of UTAUT-3 in interpreting academician’s adoption to e-Learning in higher education environments. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 17(1), 86–106. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-05-2019-0020
Halili, S. H., & Sulaiman, H. (2019). Factors influencing the rural students’ acceptance of using ICT for educational purposes. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 40(3), 574–579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2017.12.022
Karimah, U., Retnawati, H., Hadiana, D., Pujiastuti, P., & Yusron, E. (2021). The Characteristics of Chemistry Test Items on Nationally-Standardized School Examination in Yogyakarta City. Research and Evaluation in Education, 7(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v7i1.31297
Kasim, N. N. M., & Khalid, F. (2016). Choosing the right learning management system (LMS) for the higher education institution context: A systematic review. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 11(6), 55–61. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v11i06.5644
Kim, J., & Lee, K. S. S. (2020). Conceptual model to predict Filipino teachers’ adoption of ICT-based instruction in class: using the UTAUT model. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 00(00), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2020.1776213
Liebenberg, J., Benade, T., & Ellis, S. (2018). Acceptance of ICT : Applicability of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology ( UTAUT ) to South African Students. The African Journal of Information Systems, 10(3), 160–174.
Lopes, A. P. (2015). Learning Management Systems in Higher Education=. Proceedings of EDULEARN14 Conference, July, 5360–5366. https://doi.org/ISBN: 978-84-616-0763-1
Mikalef, P., Pappas, I. O., & Giannakos, M. (2016). An integrative adoption model of video-based learning. International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 33(4), 219–235. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-01-2016-0007
Rahman, M., Daud, M. Y., & Ensimau, N. K. (2019). Learning Management System (LMS) in Teaching and Learning. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(11), 1529–1535. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v9-i11/6717
Santosa, P. I. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif-Pengembangan Hipotesis dan Pengujiannya Menggunakan SmartPLS (I). ANDI.
Šumak, B., & Šorgo, A. (2016). The acceptance and use of interactive whiteboards among teachers: Differences in UTAUT determinants between pre- and post-adopters. Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 602–620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.037
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. JSTOR, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inoche.2016.03.015
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. JSTOR, 36(1), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.1109/MWSYM.2015.7167037
Wijaya, T. T., Cao, Y., Weinhandl, R., Yusron, E., & Lavicza, Z. (2022). Applying the UTAUT Model to Understand Factors Affecting Micro-Lecture Usage by Mathematics Teachers in China. Mathematics, 10(7), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10071008
Wong, K. T., Teo, T., & Russo, S. (2013). Interactive Whiteboard Acceptance: Applicability of the UTAUT Model to Student Teachers. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 22(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-012-0001-9
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
